Overall Winners Across All Variations
The Take
- We ran it twice, no format options.
- Ask casually: Mistral and Nova open with “Certainly!”, four more fence it, only 5 of 11 are clean.
- Add “return ONLY JSON, no markdown”: 0 preambles, 9 of 11 clean.
- The preamble isn’t gone, it’s dormant. Stop policing and half revert.
- GPT-5.6 Sol, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Grok 4.3, and Qwen3 235B were clean both ways.
The Casual Ask
How most people actually prompt: name the keys, but drop the ONLY and the no-markdown rules. Do the old manners come back?
The Prompt
Return a valid JSON object with these keys: name (string), age (number), active (boolean)
GPT-5.6 Sol
{"name":"Alex","age":30,"active":true}Claude Opus 5
```json
{
"name": "Alice Johnson",
"age": 32,
"active": true
}
```Gemini 3.1 Pro
{
"name": "Jane Doe",
"age": 28,
"active": true
}Grok 4.3
{
"name": "Alice",
"age": 30,
"active": true
}DeepSeek V3
```json
{
"name": "John Doe",
"age": 30,
"active": true
}
```Qwen3 235B
{
"name": "Alice",
"age": 30,
"active": true
}Llama 4 Maverick
```json
{
"name": "John Doe",
"age": 30,
"active": true
}
```Mistral Large 3
Here is a valid JSON object with the requested keys:
```json
{
"name": "John Doe",
"age": 30,
"active": true
}
```
You can customize the values as needed. For example:
- `name`: Any string (e.g., `"Alice"`).
- `age`: Any number (e.g., `25`).
- `active`: Either `true` or `false`.Nova Pro
Certainly! Below is a valid JSON object with the specified keys: `name` (string), `age` (number), and `active` (boolean).
```json
{
"name": "John Doe",
"age": 30,
"active": true
}
```
Here's a brief explanation of each key:
- `"name": "John Doe"`: The `name` key holds a string value.
- `"age": 30`: The `age` key holds a number value.
- `"active": true`: The `active` key holds a boolean value.Nemotron 12B
{
"name": "<THE_PERSONS_NAME>",
"age": <PERSONS_AGE>,
"active": <TRUE or FALSE>
}Kimi K2.5
```json
{
"name": "Alex",
"age": 28,
"active": true
}
```The Take
- Drop one sentence and the habits come back.
- Mistral and Nova open with “Here is a valid JSON object…” and “Certainly!”
- Claude Opus 5, DeepSeek, Llama, and Kimi wrap theirs in a fence.
- 5 of 11 hand back a bare object. Nemotron’s is clean but uses placeholder values.
The Hard Ask
Now push hard: the same keys, but explicitly forbid explanations, markdown, and code fences. Maximum instruction. Do they fall into line?
The Prompt
Return ONLY a valid JSON object with these keys: name (string), age (number), active (boolean). Do not include any explanation, greeting, markdown, or code fences. Output nothing but the raw JSON object.
GPT-5.6 Sol
{"name":"Alex","age":30,"active":true}Claude Opus 5
{"name": "John Doe", "age": 30, "active": true}Gemini 3.1 Pro
{
"name": "John Doe",
"age": 30,
"active": true
}Grok 4.3
{"name":"Alice","age":25,"active":true}DeepSeek V3
{"name": "John Doe", "age": 30, "active": true}Qwen3 235B
{"name": "John Doe", "age": 35, "active": true}Llama 4 Maverick
{"name": "John Doe", "age": 30, "active": true}Mistral Large 3
```json
{
"name": "John Doe",
"age": 30,
"active": true
}
```Nova Pro
{
"name": "John Doe",
"age": 30,
"active": true
}Nemotron 12B
```json
{
"name": "John Doe",
"age": 30,
"active": true
}
```Kimi K2.5
{"name": "Alex", "age": 28, "active": true}The Take
- Told firmly, they behave. 9 of 11 return raw JSON, 0 preambles.
- Only Mistral Large 3 and Nemotron still fence it, and the JSON inside is valid.
- One extra sentence moves compliance from 5 to 9.
Try this comparison in AI Lab
See the full comparison, test your own prompts, and compare any models you want. No commitment on the monthly plan.
Models We Didn't Test
Reasoning variants (o3, R1, Grok reasoning): Excluded to keep this a fast one-shot snapshot of chat models; reasoning models add latency without changing formatting behavior.
Are you a model provider? Don't see your model here? Get in touch — we'll evaluate it for AI Lab integration.